One drone. One simple question.
Unverified
They can't even tell whose it is.
So the safe answer is no — and the rules stay restrictive.
The missing piece
Not a better drone. A way to prove whose it is.
An early attempt at that. Most of it isn't built yet.
Identify·Verify·Authorize·Monitor
01Where drones stall today
₹2.5T
India's projected drone market by 2030
38,575
drones nationwide with a verified ID today
The distance between those two numbers is trust.
Authorities can't see what's in the sky, so they can't trust it.
Drone compliance in both the US and India runs on paperwork and registration, not real-time field identification. Agencies have no reliable way to tell an authorized drone from an unauthorized one while it's actually in the air.
India's own attempt, Digital Sky, is fragmented across portals and leans on operator self-declaration — unreliable enough that DGCA began migrating drone services to eGCA in 2025. Remote ID broadcast isn't mandated until 2027.
So regulators choose between under-enforcement and blanket restriction. Those restrictions stalled two of my own drone projects, which is how I ended up here.
02What aviation did in 2010
Aviation already solved this once.
Before ADS-B, controllers relied on radar — an echo off an aircraft that could not say who it was. Slower, less accurate, less certain.
ADS-B changed the direction of the information. Each aircraft broadcasts its own verified position, once a second, and the ground simply listens.
The FAA mandated it in 2010 and gave the industry a decade to fit it. The lesson isn't the radio protocol — it's the order the four things happened in.
- Visibility
- Trust
- Regulation
- Growth
03What DATC actually is
DATC is a way to check whose drone that is — while it's still in the air.
-
The drone
Carries a module that reports its identity continuously, in flight.
-
DATC
Checks that identity and its permission against a live central record.
-
The authority
Sees what is actually flying — and can clear it, or ground it.
That's the whole idea. Everything below is how far it has actually got.
04How it works, in three parts
Give the drone an identity it reports in real time.
The same idea, applied to drones, in three parts.
-
01
Verifiable identity
A unique ID tied to owner, model and licence validity — checked electronically in flight, not once at registration.
-
02
Live authorization
Permission status updates from a central platform, instead of living in a record the operator controls and declares.
-
03
Real-time intervention
An authority can ground an active flight, rather than deny a permit beforehand or read a log afterwards.
05Built, and not built
This is early. Here's what's built and what isn't.
Registration & safety analysis
A web form feeding a SQLite backend that scores thrust margin, endurance, wind risk and payload utilization automatically.
Authority approval dashboard
A desktop app where an authority reviews pending registrations against those metrics and approves or denies with a structured reason.
Encrypted licence credential
Approved drones get a Fernet-encrypted QR licence. The link it points to isn't hosted yet — a known gap, not a hidden one.
Physical module
Early experiments only: API calls, heartbeat, control logic over Wi-Fi. No long-range link. The plan is cellular; it isn't built.
Real-world testing
Nothing has flown. Performance under real conditions is unknown.
Two problems this doesn't solve
It only matters if authorities adopt it. Without regulatory integration, a verification layer nobody is obliged to check is just a concept.
It centralises sensitive data. Licensing and operator records in one place raises privacy and governance questions that would need answering — access controls, retention, legal basis — before any of this went near a real deployment.
06The ask
Fifteen minutes would help a lot.
Vihaan Mittal — Grade 9, Pathways School Gurgaon.
Email meor copy it —